Make.com vs Zapier vs N8N vs AI Coding Agents: Best Automation for Australian Businesses (2026)

Last Updated: February 2026

By AJ Awan, Former EY Management Consultant, AI Consultant & Founder at Flowtivity

The automation landscape for Australian businesses has fundamentally changed. Two years ago, the conversation was simple: Make.com or Zapier? Today, AI coding agents like Claude Code and GPT-5.3 Codex can build entire custom applications in hours, not just connect two apps together. For Australian SMBs, the question is no longer which drag-and-drop tool to pick. It is whether you need a drag-and-drop tool at all.

This guide covers both categories honestly. No-code workflow platforms (Make.com, Zapier, N8N) remain excellent for straightforward automations. But AI coding agents open up possibilities that no-code simply cannot match. At Flowtivity, we use all five of these tools depending on the job, and we will help you figure out which suits your business.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "Make.com vs Zapier vs N8N vs AI Coding Agents: Best Automation for Australian Businesses (2026)",
  "author": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "name": "AJ Awan",
    "jobTitle": "AI Consultant & Founder",
    "affiliation": {
      "@type": "Organization",
      "name": "Flowtivity"
    },
    "description": "Former EY management consultant, AI Consultant & Founder at Flowtivity"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-02-09",
  "dateModified": "2026-02-09",
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "Flowtivity",
    "url": "https://flowtivity.ai"
  },
  "description": "Comprehensive comparison of Make.com, Zapier, N8N, Claude Code, and GPT Codex for Australian SMBs. Pricing, features, and which to choose for your business."
}
</script>

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What is the best automation platform for Australian small businesses in 2026?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "For simple workflow automation like form submissions, CRM syncing, and email notifications, Make.com offers the best value at $9 per month for 10,000 operations. For complex custom systems like AI chatbots, client portals, or multi-step business logic, Claude Code at $20 per month can build entire applications that no-code tools cannot replicate."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Is Make.com cheaper than Zapier for Australian businesses?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Yes, significantly. Make.com's Basic plan costs $9 per month for 10,000 operations, while Zapier's Professional plan starts at $19.99 per month for 2,000 tasks. Make.com typically delivers five to ten times more value per dollar for workflow automation, though Zapier offers a larger library of pre-built integrations."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Can AI coding agents like Claude Code replace Make.com or Zapier?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "For simple automations, no. Make.com and Zapier are faster to set up for basic workflows like connecting a form to a spreadsheet. But for complex requirements like custom dashboards, AI-powered chatbots, or bespoke client portals, AI coding agents can build complete solutions that no-code tools cannot handle. Many businesses benefit from using both approaches."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Is N8N really free to use?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "The self-hosted community edition of N8N is free with unlimited executions. However, you need your own server, which typically costs $5 to $20 per month for hosting. N8N Cloud plans start at $20 per month with execution limits. Self-hosting requires technical knowledge to set up and maintain, making it best suited for businesses with some IT capability."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Do automation platforms store Australian business data overseas?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Yes. Make.com, Zapier, and the AI coding agents all process data on US or EU infrastructure. N8N is the exception when self-hosted on Australian servers. For businesses handling sensitive data under Australian privacy regulations, self-hosted N8N or custom-built solutions via AI coding agents deployed on Australian cloud infrastructure offer the most control over data residency."
      }
    }
  ]
}
</script>

What Is the Best Automation Platform for Australian Businesses?

The best automation platform depends on what you are automating. For simple, repeatable workflows like syncing leads from a web form to your CRM, Make.com offers unbeatable value at $9 per month for 10,000 operations. For complex, custom systems like AI-powered client portals or intelligent job scheduling, AI coding agents like Claude Code can build entire applications from a text brief. Most Australian SMBs benefit from using both approaches: no-code tools for the simple stuff, and AI coding agents when they need something truly custom.

The automation market has split into two distinct categories, and understanding the difference is crucial for making the right investment.

No-code workflow platforms (Make.com, Zapier, N8N) connect existing apps together. They are brilliant at moving data between systems. When a new lead fills out your web form, these tools can automatically add them to your CRM, send a welcome email, and notify your sales team on Slack.

AI coding agents (Claude Code, GPT-5.3 Codex) build entirely new systems from scratch. They write code, create databases, design interfaces, and deploy applications. They do not just connect apps. They create apps.

Both have a place in your toolkit. The question is which you need for each specific task.

How Does Make.com Compare?

Make.com (formerly Integromat) is the visual automation platform that offers the best balance of power, flexibility, and price for Australian businesses. Its drag-and-drop scenario builder handles complex branching logic better than Zapier, and its operation-based pricing delivers significantly more value per dollar. Make.com supports over 1,800 integrations and allows custom API connections for anything not natively supported. Its main limitation is that it struggles with highly complex business logic that goes beyond connecting APIs, and it cannot create custom user interfaces or standalone applications.

Make.com is Flowtivity's go-to tool for workflow automation. We build hundreds of scenarios for Australian businesses each year, and it handles the vast majority of standard automation needs.

Strengths:

• Visual scenario builder: The flowchart-style interface makes complex workflows easy to understand and debug. You can see exactly how data flows between steps.
• Affordable at scale: At $9 per month for 10,000 operations on the Basic plan, Make.com is dramatically cheaper than Zapier for high-volume automations.
• Flexible data handling: Built-in tools for JSON parsing, array manipulation, and data transformation mean you rarely hit a wall with data formatting.
• Custom API connections: The HTTP module lets you connect to any API, even if there is no native integration. This is invaluable for Australian-specific platforms.
• Router and filter logic: Split workflows into multiple branches based on conditions. Far more powerful than Zapier's basic filter system.

Weaknesses:

• Complex logic ceiling: When your automation needs sophisticated decision-making, error recovery across multiple systems, or stateful processing, Make.com scenarios become unwieldy.
• No custom interfaces: Make.com moves data between apps but cannot create the apps themselves. If you need a custom dashboard or client portal, you need something else.
• Learning curve: The visual builder is intuitive once learned, but the initial learning curve is steeper than Zapier's simpler step-by-step approach.
• Data hosting: Servers are in the US and EU. No Australian data centre option currently exists.

Best for: Connecting existing business apps, automating repetitive data entry, syncing systems, sending notifications, and processing form submissions.

Is Zapier Worth the Price?

Zapier is the most well-known automation platform with the largest integration library at over 7,000 connected apps. It is the easiest to set up for simple, two-step automations and its new unified plans include Tables, Forms, and MCP access alongside Zaps. However, Zapier becomes expensive quickly as your automation needs grow, with its Professional plan starting at $19.99 per month for just 2,000 tasks. For Australian businesses running multiple automations at volume, the cost can escalate to hundreds of dollars monthly for workflows that Make.com handles for a fraction of the price.

Zapier is a solid choice if simplicity and breadth of integrations matter most to you. But we find most Australian SMBs outgrow it within months.

Strengths:

• Massive integration library: Over 7,000 app integrations. If an Australian SaaS tool has an automation integration, it almost certainly supports Zapier first.
• Dead simple setup: The step-by-step Zap builder is the easiest way to get a basic automation running. No learning curve for simple workflows.
• Unified platform: The 2026 plans bundle Tables (database), Forms, and MCP (AI actions) into every paid plan. This adds genuine value for teams building complete systems within Zapier's ecosystem.
• Zapier Copilot: AI-assisted Zap creation helps non-technical users build automations from natural language descriptions.

Weaknesses:

• Expensive at scale: 2,000 tasks on the $19.99 Professional plan sounds reasonable until you realise a single multi-step Zap can burn through hundreds of tasks daily. Scaling to 10,000 tasks costs significantly more.
• Limited branching logic: Paths and Filters exist, but complex conditional workflows with multiple branches are clunky compared to Make.com's visual router.
• Task counting: Every action in a multi-step Zap counts as a task. A five-step Zap triggered 100 times uses 500 tasks. Make.com counts each module run as an operation, but the base allowance is five times larger.
• No self-hosted option: All data processed on Zapier's infrastructure. No option for Australian hosting.

Best for: Businesses that need quick, simple automations with minimal setup time, especially if you rely on niche apps that only integrate with Zapier.

Should You Use N8N Instead?

N8N is the open-source automation platform that gives you full control over your data and infrastructure. The self-hosted community edition is completely free with unlimited executions, making it the most cost-effective option for technically capable teams. N8N Cloud plans start at $20 per month. The platform supports over 400 native integrations and allows custom nodes for anything else. Its main drawback is the technical knowledge required for self-hosting: you need to manage servers, updates, backups, and security yourself. For Australian businesses concerned about data sovereignty, self-hosting N8N on Australian infrastructure is the only automation platform option that keeps all data onshore.

Strengths:

• Free self-hosted tier: Unlimited workflows and executions on your own server. The community edition is genuinely free, not a trial.
• Data sovereignty: Self-host on Australian cloud providers (AWS Sydney, Google Cloud Sydney, or local providers) and keep all business data onshore. This is unique among automation platforms.
• Open source transparency: The code is publicly available. You can inspect exactly what happens with your data.
• Advanced capabilities: Built-in code nodes (JavaScript, Python), AI agent workflows, and complex branching logic. More technically powerful than both Make.com and Zapier.
• No vendor lock-in: Your workflows live on your infrastructure. If N8N disappears tomorrow, your automations keep running.

Weaknesses:

• Technical setup required: Installing, configuring, and maintaining N8N requires server administration skills. This is not a tool you hand to a non-technical office manager.
• Smaller integration library: Around 400 native integrations compared to Zapier's 7,000 and Make.com's 1,800. You will need custom HTTP nodes more often.
• Self-hosted maintenance: Security patches, database backups, SSL certificates, and server monitoring are all your responsibility.
• Cloud pricing changes: Recent pricing changes for N8N Cloud and self-hosted business plans have frustrated some users, with execution limits on paid tiers that do not apply to the free community edition.

Best for: Technically capable teams that prioritise data sovereignty, cost control, and flexibility. Particularly strong for Australian businesses in regulated industries that need onshore data processing.

Can AI Coding Agents Replace No-Code Tools?

AI coding agents cannot fully replace no-code tools, but they can do things no-code tools never will. Claude Code and GPT-5.3 Codex do not just connect existing apps. They build entirely new applications from a text description. A tradie can describe their ideal job scheduling system and Claude Code will design the database, write the backend, create the user interface, and deploy it. No-code tools connect what already exists. AI coding agents create what does not exist yet. For complex, custom business systems, coding agents are faster, cheaper, and more capable than any no-code platform.

This is the most important section of this guide because it represents a fundamental shift in what is possible for small businesses.

What AI coding agents actually do:

Traditional automation tools connect App A to App B. AI coding agents write entire software systems. The difference is not incremental. It is categorical.

Here is a real example. A childcare centre wanted a parent communication portal where parents could view daily reports, photos, incident notifications, and billing. With Make.com, you could connect their existing systems and send automated emails. With Claude Code, you can build the entire portal from scratch: user authentication, a dashboard, photo galleries, notification preferences, payment integration, and mobile-responsive design. All from a single text brief.

Claude Code (Anthropic):

• What it does: Autonomous, multi-file coding agent powered by Opus 4.6. Give it a project brief and it plans, writes, tests, and debugs code with minimal human input.
• Best at: Building complete web applications, complex automation scripts, custom dashboards, AI-powered chatbots, and data processing pipelines.
• Pricing: Claude Pro at US$20/month (approximately AU$32/month). API access available for production workloads.
• SWE-Bench Verified: 80.8%, the highest score for real-world software engineering tasks.

GPT-5.3 Codex (OpenAI):

• What it does: Interactive coding agent that works alongside you in real time. You steer the agent while it writes, runs, and debugs code.
• Best at: Rapid prototyping, debugging, terminal-driven workflows, and iterative development where you want to stay in the loop.
• Pricing: ChatGPT Plus at US$20/month (approximately AU$32/month). API pricing at $1.75 per million input tokens.
• Terminal-Bench 2.0: 77.3%, the highest score for terminal and interactive coding tasks.

When no-code wins over coding agents:

• Connecting a web form to a Google Sheet (Make.com: 5 minutes. Claude Code: overkill.)
• Syncing contacts between your CRM and email platform (Zapier: 3 minutes.)
• Sending a Slack notification when a new invoice is created (Make.com: 2 minutes.)

When coding agents win over no-code:

• Building a custom client portal with login, dashboard, and reporting
• Creating an AI chatbot that understands your specific business context
• Developing a job scheduling system with intelligent route optimisation
• Building a custom quoting tool with dynamic pricing logic
• Creating automated compliance reporting with custom data transformations

The pattern is clear. Simple connections between existing apps? No-code. Custom systems that do not exist as off-the-shelf products? AI coding agents.

Which Platform Should You Choose?

The right platform depends on your business type, technical capability, and what you are trying to build. A tradie wanting automated appointment reminders has completely different needs to a professional services firm wanting a custom client portal. Here is a practical decision framework based on the hundreds of automation projects Flowtivity has delivered for Australian businesses.

Tradies and Field Service Businesses:

• For job scheduling and reminders: Make.com. Connect your booking system to SMS and email notifications. Simple, reliable, affordable.
• For a custom job management system: Claude Code. Build a purpose-built system with GPS tracking, photo documentation, automated invoicing, and customer communication. No off-the-shelf tool does exactly what you need.

Childcare Centres and Education:

• For parent notification emails: Zapier or Make.com. Connect your management system to email and SMS. Done in minutes.
• For a custom parent portal: Claude Code. Build a branded portal where parents view daily reports, photos, learning outcomes, and billing. Nothing on the market does this well for Australian childcare compliance requirements.

Dental and Medical Practices:

• For appointment reminders and review requests: Make.com. Automate the entire patient communication flow from booking to post-visit review request.
• For a custom patient intake and records system: Claude Code, deployed on Australian infrastructure for data sovereignty. Build exactly the workflow your practice needs, compliant with Australian health data regulations.

Professional Services (Accounting, Legal, Consulting):

• For CRM and email automation: Make.com or Zapier. Sync your client data, automate follow-ups, and track engagement.
• For custom reporting dashboards and client portals: Claude Code. Build bespoke systems that pull data from multiple sources and present it exactly how your clients need to see it.
• For data sovereignty requirements: N8N self-hosted on Australian servers. Keep all client data onshore.

Tech Startups:

• For internal workflow automation: N8N self-hosted. Free, flexible, and your engineering team can maintain it.
• For building product features: Claude Code for autonomous feature development. GPT-5.3 Codex for interactive debugging and rapid iteration. Use both.

What About Cost?

Cost varies dramatically across these five platforms, and the cheapest option depends entirely on your usage volume and what you are building. For basic workflow automation, Make.com offers the best value. For custom application development, AI coding agents are extraordinarily cost-effective compared to traditional development. Here is a complete pricing breakdown to help Australian businesses budget accurately.

Make.com Pricing:

• Free: 1,000 operations per month, 2 active scenarios
• Basic: US$9/month for 10,000 operations
• Standard: US$16/month for 40,000 operations
• Pro: US$29/month for 150,000 operations
• Teams: US$34/month for 200,000 operations
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Zapier Pricing:

• Free: 100 tasks per month, two-step Zaps only
• Professional: US$19.99/month for 2,000 tasks (billed annually)
• Team: US$69/month for 2,000 tasks with 25 users
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

N8N Pricing:

• Community (self-hosted): Free, unlimited executions
• Cloud Starter: US$20/month with execution limits
• Cloud Pro: US$50/month with higher limits
• Enterprise: Custom pricing
• Self-hosting costs: Typically AU$5 to $30/month for server hosting

Claude Code (via Claude Pro):

• Claude Pro: US$20/month (approximately AU$32/month)
• Claude Max: US$100 or US$200/month for higher usage
• API: US$5.00 per million input tokens, US$25.00 per million output tokens

GPT-5.3 Codex (via ChatGPT Plus):

• ChatGPT Plus: US$20/month (approximately AU$32/month)
• ChatGPT Pro: US$200/month for maximum limits
• API: US$1.75 per million input tokens, US$14.00 per million output tokens

Cost Comparison for Common Scenarios:

• Automating 5,000 form submissions per month: Make.com Basic at $9/month vs Zapier Professional at $29.99/month (need higher task tier). Make.com wins by 3x.
• Building a custom client portal: Traditional developer at $5,000 to $15,000 vs Claude Code at $20/month (built in a few days). AI coding agent wins dramatically.
• Running 50,000 workflow executions per month: Make.com Pro at $29/month vs Zapier at $100+/month vs N8N self-hosted at $10/month server cost. N8N wins if you have the technical skills.

The real cost insight: For Australian SMBs, combining Make.com ($9/month) for workflow automation with Claude Pro ($32/month AUD) for custom development gives you enormous capability for under $50 per month. That combination handles everything from simple email automations to building complete custom applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best automation platform for Australian small businesses in 2026?

For simple workflow automation, Make.com offers the best value at $9 per month for 10,000 operations. For complex custom systems, Claude Code at $20 per month can build entire applications. Most businesses benefit from using both.

Is Make.com cheaper than Zapier?

Yes, significantly. Make.com Basic costs $9 per month for 10,000 operations. Zapier Professional starts at $19.99 per month for 2,000 tasks. Make.com typically delivers five to ten times more automation per dollar.

Can AI coding agents replace Make.com or Zapier?

For simple automations, no. No-code tools are faster for basic workflows. For complex custom systems like client portals, AI chatbots, and bespoke dashboards, AI coding agents build solutions that no-code tools simply cannot create.

Is N8N really free?

The self-hosted community edition is free with unlimited executions. You need your own server (typically $5 to $20/month). N8N Cloud plans start at $20/month with execution limits.

Do these platforms store data in Australia?

Only N8N when self-hosted on Australian servers. Make.com, Zapier, and the AI coding agents process data on US or EU infrastructure. For data sovereignty requirements, self-hosted N8N or custom-built solutions deployed on Australian cloud infrastructure are your best options.

AJ Awan is a former EY management consultant, AI consultant, and founder of Flowtivity, where he helps Australian businesses automate and grow using the right mix of no-code tools and AI coding agents. Get in touch to find out which approach suits your business.